Part
of the Krakauer problem then becomes a problem of genre confusion. To
be sure, Under the Banner of Heaven is meticulously researched with
extensive endnotes. And Krakauer’s hours of interviews with former
members of the FLDS expose the abuses that the leadership of this
insular community have long perpetrated. And he does so with arguably
more authority than even the many Mormon fundamentalist captivity
narratives published before or since. Yet, more than history or
investigative journalism, Under the Banner of Heaven is first and
foremost a page-turning polemic against religion in general and
Mormonism—in all its forms—in particular. As such, if it can be solved
at all, the Krakauer problem cannot be solved by peer-reviewed
biographies of Joseph Smith, like Richard Bushman’s celebrated and
exhaustive Rough Stone Rolling, published in 2005.* Nor can it be solved
by trade press books like Bowman’s own The Mormon People, which came
out in 2012, and has been perhaps the best single-volume history of
Mormonism published in the last decade. Krakauer tells a better, more
gripping story because he writes by a different set of rules that values
thesis over fact. - See more at:
http://religionandpolitics.org/2015/07/14/mormonism-and-the-problem-of-jon-krakauer/#sthash.MmEONSR1.dpuf
And
yet the Krakauer problem doesn’t end with problematic sources and
faulty interpretations of theology. To contextualize Under the Banner of
Heaven as a piece of writing, the literary “parents” to Krakauer’s book
are not only twentieth-century true-crime thrillers and captivity
narratives like Capote’s In Cold Blood (which, of course, has also been
criticized for blurring the lines between fact and fiction in service of
a better story). Bowman says Krakauer’s version of Mormon history is
“descended from the works of Arthur Conan Doyle, Robert Louis Stevenson,
and Jack London who all wrote nineteenth-century dime novels premised
on the notion that Brigham Young’s Zion was a totalitarian dictatorship
complete with secret police and young Mormon maidens pining for rescue
from the grimly-bearded elders of the church.” - See more at:
http://religionandpolitics.org/2015/07/14/mormonism-and-the-problem-of-jon-krakauer/#sthash.MmEONSR1.dpuf
And
yet the Krakauer problem doesn’t end with problematic sources and
faulty interpretations of theology. To contextualize Under the Banner of
Heaven as a piece of writing, the literary “parents” to Krakauer’s book
are not only twentieth-century true-crime thrillers and captivity
narratives like Capote’s In Cold Blood (which, of course, has also been
criticized for blurring the lines between fact and fiction in service of
a better story). Bowman says Krakauer’s version of Mormon history is
“descended from the works of Arthur Conan Doyle, Robert Louis Stevenson,
and Jack London who all wrote nineteenth-century dime novels premised
on the notion that Brigham Young’s Zion was a totalitarian dictatorship
complete with secret police and young Mormon maidens pining for rescue
from the grimly-bearded elders of the church.” - See more at:
http://religionandpolitics.org/2015/07/14/mormonism-and-the-problem-of-jon-krakauer/#sthash.MmEONSR1.dpuf
And
yet the Krakauer problem doesn’t end with problematic sources and
faulty interpretations of theology. To contextualize Under the Banner of
Heaven as a piece of writing, the literary “parents” to Krakauer’s book
are not only twentieth-century true-crime thrillers and captivity
narratives like Capote’s In Cold Blood (which, of course, has also been
criticized for blurring the lines between fact and fiction in service of
a better story). Bowman says Krakauer’s version of Mormon history is
“descended from the works of Arthur Conan Doyle, Robert Louis Stevenson,
and Jack London who all wrote nineteenth-century dime novels premised
on the notion that Brigham Young’s Zion was a totalitarian dictatorship
complete with secret police and young Mormon maidens pining for rescue
from the grimly-bearded elders of the church.” - See more at:
http://religionandpolitics.org/2015/07/14/mormonism-and-the-problem-of-jon-krakauer/#sthash.MmEONSR1.dpuf
And
yet the Krakauer problem doesn’t end with problematic sources and
faulty interpretations of theology. To contextualize Under the Banner of
Heaven as a piece of writing, the literary “parents” to Krakauer’s book
are not only twentieth-century true-crime thrillers and captivity
narratives like Capote’s In Cold Blood (which, of course, has also been
criticized for blurring the lines between fact and fiction in service of
a better story). Bowman says Krakauer’s version of Mormon history is
“descended from the works of Arthur Conan Doyle, Robert Louis Stevenson,
and Jack London who all wrote nineteenth-century dime novels premised
on the notion that Brigham Young’s Zion was a totalitarian dictatorship
complete with secret police and young Mormon maidens pining for rescue
from the grimly-bearded elders of the church.” - See more at:
http://religionandpolitics.org/2015/07/14/mormonism-and-the-problem-of-jon-krakauer/#sthash.MmEONSR1.dpuf
No comments:
Post a Comment